Payment terms when importing
How T/T and L/C work for torch orders, where risk sits in each, and the clauses to agree before a deposit moves.
Read the payment terms guideBlog · B2B Sourcing
Three letters on a quotation decide who books the ship, who clears the export, who carries the insurance - and, less obviously, at which exact moment the goods become your risk. EXW, FOB and CIF are the three terms most torch buyers will actually meet, and each is a different division of labor between factory and buyer. This article explains what each term means, where responsibility passes, and what to confirm in your contract and with your forwarder before a single carton moves.
About a 6-minute read · English edition
A framework note first: Incoterms are the International Chamber of Commerce's published trade rules - the current edition is referred to as Incoterms 2020 - and they allocate tasks, costs and risk between seller and buyer. Two things they deliberately do not do: they do not transfer ownership of the goods, and they do not govern payment. Those live in your sales contract as separate clauses.
EXW is the minimal seller obligation: the factory makes the packed goods available at its premises, and from that point everything is the buyer's job - loading, export clearance in China, the main carriage, insurance, import clearance at destination. What EXW buys you is control: buyers with their own freight forwarder operating in China often prefer it, because their forwarder controls every leg and every cost from the factory gate. What it costs you is coordination: every arrangement, document and local fee becomes yours to manage. For a first-time importer without a trusted forwarder on the ground, EXW usually saves less than it complicates.
FOB is the workhorse term of China sea freight. The seller prepares and clears the goods for export and delivers them on board the vessel at the named Chinese port of shipment; risk transfers at that moment, when the goods are on board. From there the buyer's side takes over: arranging and paying the main ocean carriage, and insuring the voyage. FOB is popular because it splits the job along a clean line - the factory handles everything it is genuinely positioned to handle (truck, export declaration, terminal), while the buyer keeps control of the freight spend through its own forwarder or carrier rates.
CIF looks like the opposite of FOB and is closer to a variation than buyers expect. The seller arranges and pays for the carriage to the named destination port and provides insurance cover for the buyer's benefit during the voyage. But the crucial framework point: risk still transfers when the goods are loaded on board at the origin port - the same moment as FOB. The seller's payment obligation extends to destination; the seller's risk does not. If the cargo is lost at sea, the buyer claims under the insurance the seller arranged. CIF suits buyers who prefer a single origin-side package and a landed-price structure; the trade-off is that the buyer gives up control of the carrier and the insurance choice.
| Task | EXW | FOB | CIF |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goods made available, packed | Seller | Seller | Seller |
| Loading at origin | Buyer | Seller | Seller |
| Export clearance (China) | Buyer | Seller | Seller |
| Main carriage to destination | Buyer | Buyer | Seller |
| Voyage insurance | Buyer | Buyer | Seller (buyer is beneficiary) |
| Import clearance at destination | Buyer | Buyer | Buyer |
| Risk transfers when | Goods at seller's premises | Goods on board at port of shipment | Goods on board at port of shipment |
Read the last row twice: it is the single most misunderstood line in import sourcing. Under CIF the seller pays for the voyage but does not carry the voyage's risk - the payment obligation and the risk obligation end at different points.
Gas torches travel as dangerous goods under the applicable transport rules - filled with fuel gas, they fall under the classifications your freight forwarder works with daily. This matters for term selection only indirectly: whichever Incoterm you choose, the export side must produce compliant dangerous-goods packaging and documentation, and the carrier must accept the cargo. What the term changes is who arranges each leg - never what the cargo legally requires. For this reason alone, torch shipments deserve a freight forwarder with genuine dangerous-goods experience, and export factories that ship this category routinely (ours does, to 40+ countries) will have the packaging and documentation process in place.
Final caution, worth its own sentence: this article is a framework overview, not legal advice - the binding allocation of tasks, costs and risk is the one written in your trade contract, and the practical routing should be confirmed with your freight forwarder before booking.
If you are assembling quotations, our OEM/ODM page lists the commercial framework, and the contact page is the direct route to confirm terms, documentation and shipping support for your specific order.
FAQ
Ex Works: the seller makes the goods available at its premises and everything after that - loading, export clearance, main carriage, insurance, import clearance - is the buyer's side of the ledger. It suits buyers with their own freight forwarder operating in China; without one, the savings rarely justify the coordination burden.
FOB is the term most commonly used for containerized sea freight in China sourcing: the seller clears export and delivers the goods on board the vessel at the named port of shipment, while the buyer arranges and pays for the main carriage and insurance. It keeps the buyer's own freight rates in play while leaving origin-side handling with the factory.
This is the point that surprises buyers: under CIF the seller pays for carriage and insurance to the destination port, but risk still transfers when the goods are loaded on board at the origin port. A loss at sea is therefore the buyer's risk, handled through the insurance the seller was required to arrange - so the practical answer is: check the contract, the policy and your forwarder's advice before the voyage, not after.
No. Incoterms allocate tasks, costs and risk of the delivery process - not title, not payment terms, not warranty. Ownership transfers as your sales contract says it transfers; the Incoterm and the payment term are separate clauses that need separate negotiation.
No - gas torches travel as dangerous goods under the applicable transport rules regardless of which Incoterm the contract uses. What changes with the term is who arranges each leg, not what the cargo legally requires. Use a freight forwarder experienced with dangerous-goods documentation, whichever term you pick.
Related Products & Guides
How T/T and L/C work for torch orders, where risk sits in each, and the clauses to agree before a deposit moves.
Read the payment terms guideThresholds, customization scope and lead times - the commercial framework behind the quotation.
Open the OEM/ODM pageSend your destination port and quantity - we confirm workable Incoterms, documentation and lead time for your order.
Contact the factorySend the port and quantity - we quote on the Incoterm you choose, with the documentation path confirmed before booking.